ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Seong-Wan Hong, Sang Ho Kim, Rae-Joon Park
Nuclear Technology | Volume 206 | Number 3 | March 2020 | Pages 401-413
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1654816
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the postulated severe accidents of nuclear power plants, the interaction mode of the molten corium with water happens differently depending on the height of the water level in the reactor cavity. The interaction of the molten corium with the partially filled water in the reactor cavity has been extensively studied. The molten corium in this case was released into the water after free falling to some distance. Meanwhile, some advanced reactors have adapted the in-vessel corium retention concept by cooling the reactor vessel’s outside wall. If a reactor vessel failure happens in this case, the molten corium in the reactor vessel is injected directly into the water without any free fall. Triggered steam explosion experiments were carried out to compare the explosion behavior conditions of the partially flooded cavity and ex-vessel cooling. It was found that the jet breakup process before the explosion appeared differently between the two experiments. These behaviors contributed to the differences in the maximum dynamic pressure and load that express the explosion’s strength. The explosion’s strength under the partially flooded cavity condition was about two times stronger than that under ex-vessel cooling. Accordingly, it is believed that the steam explosions under conditions of ex-vessel cooling are of less concern than the partially flooded cavity condition.