ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2025
Nuclear Technology
September 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC’s hybrid AI workshop coming up
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will host a hybrid public workshop on September 24 from 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time to discuss its activities for the safe and secure use of artificial intelligence in NRC-regulated activities.
Guanyi Wang, Qingzi Zhu, Mamoru Ishii
Nuclear Technology | Volume 206 | Number 2 | February 2020 | Pages 347-357
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1626175
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
As a critical closure equation to the two-fluid model and an important tool to characterize the two-phase-flow interfacial transport, the interfacial area transport equation (IATE) was formulated by taking various physical mechanisms causing interfacial area change into account. To fulfill the dynamic prediction advantage of IATE and further replace the flow regime–based constitutive relations, the IATE model should be validated by transition data to ensure model reliability and robustness. Air-water experiments are performed in bubbly-to-slug transition flows in a 200 × 10-mm narrow rectangular duct. Four-sensor conductivity probes are used to measure the local void fraction, interfacial area concentration (IAC), and bubble velocity at three axial locations. The void fraction distribution changes significantly with the flow developing. Flow conditions with a similar area-averaged void fraction but different superficial mixture velocities are compared, and it is found that the superficial mixture velocity significantly affects the IAC. In addition, the two-group IATE model for narrow rectangular channel is evaluated using the collected data. The average relative error for the total IAC prediction is 11.4%, but the group II IAC is overestimated for most flow conditions.