ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
Kentucky disburses $10M in nuclear grants
The Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority (KNEDA) recently distributed its first awards through the new Nuclear Energy Development Grant Program, which was established last year. In total, KNEDA disbursed $10 million to a variety of companies that will use the funding to support siting studies, enrichment supply-chain planning, workforce training, and curriculum development.
Soon K. Lee, Maolong Liu, Nicholas R. Brown, Kurt A. Terrani, Youho Lee
Nuclear Technology | Volume 206 | Number 2 | February 2020 | Pages 339-346
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1670010
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Steady-state internal flow boiling experiments were conducted on various materials, including accident tolerant fuel cladding material Fe–12Cr–6Al (C26M2) alloy, Zircaloy, and metal-based materials, at atmospheric pressure (84 kPa), 10°C inlet subcooling, and 200 kg/m2‧s mass flow entering the test tubes until critical heat flux (CHF) was reached. The clad thickness effects on flow boiling CHF were evaluated showing a negative relation between CHF and clad thickness up to 0.711 mm. An approach was established to mechanistically understand the measured CHF differences among the tested materials using thermal effusivity, activity, diffusivity, and surface thermal economy. No clear relations were observed within the range of thermal properties of the tested materials. Compared to past CHF data for a mass flux of 300 kg/m2‧s, the CHF data for 200 kg/m2‧s showed increased relative differences among materials. This result implies that higher mass flux may further decrease apparent material sensitivity to CHF.