ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
Yiqian Wu, Zhiyao Liu, Ming Jia, Cong Chi Tran, Shengyuan Yan
Nuclear Technology | Volume 206 | Number 1 | January 2020 | Pages 94-106
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1620055
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The development of a model for mental workload (MWL) prediction of an operator in nuclear power plants (NPPs) is necessary but challenging. In this study, the validity, sensitivity, and relationship between the four indices of eye tracking (i.e., pupil dilation, blink rate, fixation rate, and saccadic rate) and subjective rating method (i.e., the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index) of both experts and nonexperts when they are operating the state-oriented procedure system in NPPs are analyzed. An artificial neural network (ANN) is used to develop the MWL prediction model using the data of nonexperts. The correlation analysis results indicate that four eye tracking indices are sensitive to the subjective MWL, but there is no significant difference in the pupil diameter and saccadic rate between the experts and nonexperts. The validity of the proposed ANN-based prediction model is proven by the high correlation coefficient (higher than 0.95) between the original and predicted data. However, when the proposed ANN model was applied to the experts’ data, there was a significant difference between the original and predicted data. Therefore, the proposed prediction model can be applied to the experts’ data but with a certain adjustment to obtain the most possibly reasonable results.