ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Fusion office bill introduced in line with DOE reorganization plan
Cornyn
Padilla
Sens. Alex Padilla (D., Calif.) and John Cornyn (R., Texas) have introduced bipartisan legislation to formally establish the Office of Fusion at the Department of Energy. This move seeks to codify one of the many changes put forward by the recent internal reorganization plan for offices at the DOE.
Companion legislation has been introduced in the House of Representatives by Reps. Don Beyer (D., Va.) and Jay Obernolte (R., Calif.), who are cochairs of the House Fusion Energy Caucus.
Details: According to Obernolte, “Congress must provide clear direction and a coordinated federal strategy to move fusion from the lab to the grid, and this legislation does exactly that.”
Tomasz Skorek
Nuclear Technology | Volume 205 | Number 12 | December 2019 | Pages 1540-1553
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1580532
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The input uncertainties propagation methods are the most frequently applied statistical methods in uncertainty analyses. Among them, particularly popular are the methods based on Wilks’ formula. Numerous studies on uncertainty analyses show that the identification and quantification of input uncertainties is a major problem with uncertainty analyses. Among input uncertainties evaluation, the identification and quantification of physical model uncertainties in thermal-hydraulic codes appear to be particularly difficult.
This paper deals with this problem by proposing inherent model uncertainties quantification by code developers in the frame of code development and validation. The introduction of the extended code validation would not only contribute to potential uncertainty analyses, solving to a large degree the problem of model uncertainties quantification, but also contribute to code validation, and as a consequence, improve the safety issues. A not-negligible factor is also better management of the resources. Instead of uncertainty quantification repeatedly performed by each user, the quantification could be performed once and, in addition, by experts having the required know-how.
Introducing this new standard in code validation would require additional effort from the code developers but integral quantification of the model uncertainties would be profitable also for code development. In fact, by code development, in particular if the model is own development of the team, such an accuracy (or uncertainty) evaluation is usually performed. The additional effort, in this case, would be to describe the present information in the form of probability distribution functions or at least in the form of ranges.