ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Quality is key: Investing in advanced nuclear research for tomorrow’s grid
As the energy sector faces mounting pressure to grow at an unprecedented pace while maintaining reliability and affordability, nuclear technology remains an essential component of the long-term solution. Southern Company stands out among U.S. utilities for its proactive role in shaping these next-generation systems—not just as a future customer, but as a hands-on innovator.
A. R. Massih
Nuclear Technology | Volume 205 | Number 7 | July 2019 | Pages 992-1001
Technical Note | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1568102
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Oxidation of UO2 fuel under off-normal and normal reactor conditions occurs when fuel cladding fails, thereby allowing steam/water to enter the fuel rod. The steam/water will react with the fuel to produce UO2+x thus releasing hydrogen, with x standing for the amount of interstitial oxygen ions above the stoichiometric value.
In this technical note the impact of fuel oxidation on fission gas release (FGR) is modeled and discussed. The classical diffusion equation is used to describe migration and release of fission product gas (Xe) in UO2+x under time-varying postirradiation annealing conditions. We assume that the main quantity affected by fuel oxidation is the effective diffusivity of fission gas. Fuel oxidation enhances the diffusivity as a function of x in UO2+x in a parabolic fashion for 0.005 ≤ x ≤ 0.12 in the temperature range of 1000 ≤ T ≤ 1600 K. We first benchmark our model against an annealing test in which for x = 0.004 the Xe release fraction was measured as a function of time (temperature) during annealing. Furthermore, we apply the model to simulate a series of postirradiation annealing tests on UO2+x fuel, in which FGR fractions were measured for a given thermal ramp history in the range 0.00 ≤ x ≤ 0.66. The results of our computations in the range 0.004 ≤ x ≤ 0.20 show good agreement with measurements.