ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Savannah River marks the closure of another legacy waste tank
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management has received concurrence from regulators that Tank 14 at the Savannah River Site has reached preliminary cease waste removal (PCWR) status after radioactive liquid waste was successfully removed from the tank. PCWR is a regulatory milestone in the closure of SRS’s old-style waste tanks, which were built in the 1950s to store waste generated by the chemical separations of plutonium and uranium.
Charles W. Forsberg, Per F. Peterson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 205 | Number 5 | May 2019 | Pages 748-754
Rapid Communication | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1573619
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Three reactor types can be designed with pebbles (carbon spheres) as the reactor core: the pebble-bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (PB-HTGR), the pebble-bed fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactor (PB-FHR), and the thermal-spectrum molten salt reactor (MSR) with fuel dissolved in coolant. In the HTGR and FHR, the pebbles are fuel (coated-particle fuel) and moderator (graphite). In a MSR the pebbles would be the moderator (no fuel). Recent advances enable prediction and modeling of pebble beds with two or more sizes of pebbles.
This may enable the use of pebble beds with multiple size pebbles that create new options. A second smaller size of HTGR/FHR fuel pebble that fills some of the space between the regular pebbles can increase the power output for the same size reactor. For the FHR the second pebble size would reduce inventory of expensive coolant and may widen choices of salt coolants. In an HTGR or FHR, smaller pebbles with high actinide loadings and high heat transfer rates could be used to burn actinides while the larger pebbles are the driver fuel. Multiple pebble sizes in MSRs may enable varying the carbon-to-fuel ratio to optimize the neutron spectrum over time to more efficiently utilize the fuel and allow easy replacement of moderator. The smaller pebbles with no fuel and a high surface-to-volume ratio could be designed to remove (1) HTGR/FHR/MSR tritium from the coolant and (2) noble metal fission products and potentially other impurities in MSRs. We examine the potential incentives for pebble beds with multiple size pebbles. With the tools now available to quantify pebble-bed behavior with multiple size pebbles, the next step is to begin to quantify benefits and limitations for different applications of pebble-bed reactors with multiple sizes of pebbles.