ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Adolf Rýdl, Leticia Fernandez-Moguel, Terttaliisa Lind
Nuclear Technology | Volume 205 | Number 5 | May 2019 | Pages 655-670
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1511213
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Aerosol scrubbing experiments are recalculated for selected POSEIDON-II series tests and TEPCO-TOSHIBA-HITACHI tests with the MELCOR/SPARC code and with the BUSCA code. The major uncertainties in the calculations are identified and the results of the analyses are used in sensitivity simulations for long-term station blackout accident sequence in a boiling water reactor (BWR) with MELCOR/SPARC. The accident sequence is similar in nature to what happened in Fukushima Unit-3.
In the analyses of experiments, the basic characteristics of the thermal-hydraulic behavior were captured very well by MELCOR/SPARC. The trends in the calculated values of decontamination factors (DFs) for aerosols were in good agreement with the data, predicting the dependence of decontamination on the effect of the submergence depth, of steam content in the gas, and of aerosol particle size. However, the absolute values of DFs as calculated by the codes were rather sensitive to changes in the default input options and the agreement with experiments was not convincing.
In the integral BWR sequence simulations, the predicted DFs for aerosols in the wetwell (WW) was sensitive in the same way as for the experiments. For this type of a scenario, the fission product (FP) releases to containment—represented by Cs and I compounds—were mostly discrete events of short duration. The release path was from the reactor vessel to WW during the operation of the safety relief valves and subsequent venting of the containment from the WW gas space. Even though the passage through the WW water in these simulations was the only way for fission products to reach the environment, the sole scrubbing potential of the wetwell was not the determining contributor to the FP retention. At least of the same importance were the details of the sequence progression, timing of events, FP speciation, and other factors.