ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2024
Latest News
Can hydrogen be the transportation fuel in an otherwise nuclear economy?
Let’s face it: The global economy should be powered primarily by nuclear power. And it probably will by the end of this century, with a still-significant assist from renewables and hydro. Once nuclear systems are dominant, the costs come down to where gas is now; and when carbon emissions are reduced to a small portion of their present state, it will become obvious that most other sources are only good in niche settings. I mean, why use small modular reactors to load-follow when they can just produce that power instead of buffering it?
Fei-Jan Tsai, Min Lee
Nuclear Technology | Volume 205 | Number 4 | April 2019 | Pages 524-541
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1500831
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This study assessed the effectiveness of in-vessel retention (IVR) in terminating the progression of an accident sequence initiated by a station blackout and large loss-of-coolant accident in a pressurized water reactor with thermal power of approximately 5000 MW. In the IVR design, external reactor vessel cooling is established by flooding of the reactor cavity. A water channel is introduced into the outer wall of the reactor vessel, and an insulated layered structure is added around the vessel. The amount of heat removed from the corium pool in the vessel lower plenum is limited by the critical heat flux (CHF) at the outer surface of the vessel wall. An integrated assessment was conducted in three steps. First, the responses of the reactor coolant system and containment were simulated using MELCOR. The predicted transient heat load at the vessel wall was then fed into RELAP5-3D, where the flow of natural, buoyancy-driven convection within the IVR water channel was simulated. Finally, the main thermal-hydraulic parameters in the IVR channel were substituted into the ULPU, SULTAN, SBLB, and MELCOR CHF correlations, and the effectiveness of IVR was assessed. The MELCOR simulation demonstrated that the heat load at the vessel wall of the lower plenum is dependent on the configuration of the debris. The heat flux to the vessel wall reached a maximum at 483 min, at an inclination angle of approximately 68 deg. The peak heat flux moved from a small inclination angle to a larger angle as the accident progressed. Both MELCOR and RELAP5-3D calculations predicted a gradual buildup of natural convection flow within the IVR channel following the application of a heat load to the vessel wall. The MELCOR code significantly overpredicts the mass flow of natural convection flow. Both codes predicted that the flow would experience large-amplitude fluctuations as the water in the IVR flow channel reached saturation. These fluctuations were attributed to instability induced by two-phase flow.
If the inlet temperature can be kept sufficiently low to obviate boiling in the IVR channel, RELAP5-3D predicts that the channel flow will approach an approximately steady state. The selected CHF correlations predicted significantly different CHFs. The MELCOR correlation, which is a correlation based on pool boiling, produced the most conservative predictions, and the CHFs predicted by SBLB had the highest value. The minimum margin was found between 55 and 75 deg in all correlations. With the exception of the MELCOR correlation, the CHF ratio predicted by the other three correlations is greater than 1.2.