ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Cen Wei, Bao-Wen Yang, Bin Han, Aiguo Liu
Nuclear Technology | Volume 205 | Number 1 | January-February 2019 | Pages 328-337
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1510266
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Mixing vanes attached to a space grid play an important role in heat transfer enhancement, thus increasing critical heat flux. Subchannel analysis and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are usually applied to simulate the coolant flow behavior in a fuel assembly. In subchannel analysis, the mixing effect, mainly turbulent mixing, produced by mixing vane grids (MVGs) is represented by a coefficient β without considering flow direction and mixing vane arrangement. However, in CFD computation, the mixing effect can be simulated more closely. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the mixing coefficient β used in subchannel analysis by a CFD code. Then, the effects of the three MVGs are compared qualitatively and quantitatively.
Through the analysis, an effective mixing coefficient adopted in the subchannal codes should be related to the vane arrangement. Improvements for β are needed to better reflect the true mixing function from the spacer grid relevant to its mixing vane arrangement. Besides the lateral velocity distribution, secondary flow intensity, temperature distribution, and thermal nonuniformity are different for different vane arrangement patterns.