ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Hanford begins removing waste from 24th single-shell tank
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management said crews at the Hanford Site near Richland, Wash., have started retrieving radioactive waste from Tank A-106, a 1-million-gallon underground storage tank built in the 1950s.
Tank A-106 will be the 24th single-shell tank that crews have cleaned out at Hanford, which is home to 177 underground waste storage tanks: 149 single-shell tanks and 28 double-shell tanks. Ranging from 55,000 gallons to more than 1 million gallons in capacity, the tanks hold around 56 million gallons of chemical and radioactive waste resulting from plutonium production at the site.
Wondea Jung
Nuclear Technology | Volume 202 | Number 2 | May-June 2018 | Pages 210-219
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1419784
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Although a feed and bleed (F&B) operation is an important emergency task having a significant effect on the risk of a pressurized water reactor–type nuclear power plant, there is a high uncertainty regarding its modeling and analysis in a probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). This paper introduces a study on the design of an operational strategy for an F&B operation based on human reliability analysis (HRA) with plant-specific thermal-hydraulic (TH) and human performance time (PT) analyses. The emergency operating procedures (EOPs) of a reference plant were modified by adding a new procedural path for the F&B operation to reduce its effect on the plant’s risk. To support the modification of the procedure, an intensive TH analysis was conducted to evaluate the plant’s behavior in diverse accident conditions and to revise the success criteria for the HRA of the F&B operation. In addition, an empirical analysis of PT required to carry out the F&B operation was conducted based on plant-specific simulator records. The PSA model of the reference plant was revised by reflecting the modified EOPs and new success criteria for the HRA of the F&B operation, which showed that core damage frequency of the revised PSA was about 50% lower than that of the original PSA.