ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Glass strategy: Hanford’s enhanced waste glass program
The mission of the Department of Energy’s Office of River Protection (ORP) is to complete the safe cleanup of waste resulting from decades of nuclear weapons development. One of the most technologically challenging responsibilities is the safe disposition of approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive waste historically stored in 177 tanks at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
ORP has a clear incentive to reduce the overall mission duration and cost. One pathway is to develop and deploy innovative technical solutions that can advance baseline flow sheets toward higher efficiency operations while reducing identified risks without compromising safety. Vitrification is the baseline process that will convert both high-level and low-level radioactive waste at Hanford into a stable glass waste form for long-term storage and disposal.
Although vitrification is a mature technology, there are key areas where technology can further reduce operational risks, advance baseline processes to maximize waste throughput, and provide the underpinning to enhance operational flexibility; all steps in reducing mission duration and cost.
Adam Davis
Nuclear Technology | Volume 200 | Number 1 | October 2017 | Pages 66-79
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1338883
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This research investigates the effect of heterogeneity in slabs of aluminum, stainless steel, and polyethylene on photon and neutron transmission. This work considers whether novel, heterogeneous combinations of these materials provides improved photon shielding (for metal-infiltrated polyethylene) or neutron shielding (for polyethylene-infiltrated metal). Often, layers of a hydrogenous material such as polyethylene must be combined with layers of a higher-atomic-number material to provide shielding for both photons and neutrons. Several heterogeneous shield configurations are studied in which slabs of a base material are implanted with metal stud arrays ranging from 5 × 5 × 5 to 11 × 11 × 11 arrays. For metal slabs infiltrated with polyethylene studs, it is found that the performance of the heterogeneous slabs as neutron shields relative to the homogeneous material is source-energy dependent. This is a larger concern for polyethylene-infiltrated aluminum (PA) than it is for polyethylene-infiltrated stainless steel (PS) as introduction of these studs impairs PA’s performance as a photon shield (relative to solid aluminum) more than it does for PS relative to solid stainless steel. For polyethylene slabs infiltrated with aluminum or stainless steel studs, it is found that introduction of a sufficiently spaced array of metal studs with a moderate-to-high photon absorption cross section will improve the photon-shielding properties of the shield without impairing the neutron-shielding properties. Use of an insufficiently opaque material or insufficiently wide spacing of the studs will impair the photon-shielding properties, thus making it a less effective shield than homogeneous polyethylene alone. This is a larger concern for PA than it is for PS. This research demonstrates that heterogeneity is more beneficial for stainless steel shields than it is for heterogeneous aluminum shields relative to homogeneous slabs of those materials.