ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
2020 ANS Virtual Winter Meeting
November 16–19, 2020
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Fusion Science and Technology
ANS members approve amendment adding YMG rep to board of directors
The American Nuclear Society will include a representative from the Young Members Group on its Board of Directors after ANS members voted this week overwhelmingly in favor of amending Article B6 of the ANS bylaws. The change was mandated by Objective Outcome 5 of the ANS Change Plan 2020.
To keep the number of directors at 16, the approved amendment decreased the number of non–U.S. resident directors from three to two.
Nitendra Singh, Arun Kumar Nayak, Parimal Pramod Kulkarni
Nuclear Technology | Volume 198 | Number 3 | June 2017 | Pages 306-318
Technical Paper | dx.doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1305764
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Melt pool coolability is one of the concerns when addressing severe accident scenarios. Long-term cooling and stabilizing of highly radioactive and reactive molten corium are still issues to be addressed and understood in order to devise a successful handling strategy. Core catchers have been envisaged in present and future advanced reactors to manage this concern. In the ex-vessel core catcher scenario, corium relocates to form a molten pool. Injecting water from the bottom of this melt pool to achieve coolability is found to be an efficient technique so far. However, the numbers of tests with prototypic materials and conditions are very limited and difficult to perform. In view of this, most of the earlier studies have been conducted with simulated melts. There are concerns with regard to scalability of experiments, effects of melt composition, and geometric parameters on melt coolability. To address these issues, series of experiments have been conducted and are presented in this paper. The experiments are performed with borosilicate glass, with two melt volumes, i.e., 3 and 20 L, and are compared. They show that the melt quenching time was more or less the same and suggest that the results can be extrapolated to higher scales. Two different simulants were used in the experiments, i.e., sodium borosilicate glass and CaO-B2O3, to study the effect of melt composition, and it was observed that the coolability behavior remains the same but the melt quenching time varies. The effect of nozzle diameters was studied by conducting experiments with three different nozzle diameters of 8, 12, and 18 mm keeping the same inlet pressure. It was found that the quenching time was higher for the 8-mm-diameter nozzle experiment due to smaller flow rates compared to the others. The experiments were repeated at two inlet water pressures of 0.35 and 0.75 bar(g) for the same nozzle diameter to study their effects on melt coolability. As expected, the quenching time was found to be less for the case of higher inlet pressure. The experimental measurements suggest that the overall average melt pool coolability behavior under bottom flooding was almost the same in all cases. However, each physical parameter affects the melt quenching time required to cool the melt. This average melt quenching time can be optimized using suitable combinations of geometric and physical parameters. The debris sizes and porosities formed during the melt eruption were also measured. The measured porosities ranged between 50% and 60% in all experiments.