ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Reactor Physics
The division's objectives are to promote the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the fundamental physical phenomena characterizing nuclear reactors and other nuclear systems. The division encourages research and disseminates information through meetings and publications. Areas of technical interest include nuclear data, particle interactions and transport, reactor and nuclear systems analysis, methods, design, validation and operating experience and standards. The Wigner Award heads the awards program.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2024
Latest News
Can hydrogen be the transportation fuel in an otherwise nuclear economy?
Let’s face it: The global economy should be powered primarily by nuclear power. And it probably will by the end of this century, with a still-significant assist from renewables and hydro. Once nuclear systems are dominant, the costs come down to where gas is now; and when carbon emissions are reduced to a small portion of their present state, it will become obvious that most other sources are only good in niche settings. I mean, why use small modular reactors to load-follow when they can just produce that power instead of buffering it?
Nitendra Singh, Arun Kumar Nayak, Parimal Pramod Kulkarni
Nuclear Technology | Volume 198 | Number 3 | June 2017 | Pages 306-318
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1305764
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Melt pool coolability is one of the concerns when addressing severe accident scenarios. Long-term cooling and stabilizing of highly radioactive and reactive molten corium are still issues to be addressed and understood in order to devise a successful handling strategy. Core catchers have been envisaged in present and future advanced reactors to manage this concern. In the ex-vessel core catcher scenario, corium relocates to form a molten pool. Injecting water from the bottom of this melt pool to achieve coolability is found to be an efficient technique so far. However, the numbers of tests with prototypic materials and conditions are very limited and difficult to perform. In view of this, most of the earlier studies have been conducted with simulated melts. There are concerns with regard to scalability of experiments, effects of melt composition, and geometric parameters on melt coolability. To address these issues, series of experiments have been conducted and are presented in this paper. The experiments are performed with borosilicate glass, with two melt volumes, i.e., 3 and 20 L, and are compared. They show that the melt quenching time was more or less the same and suggest that the results can be extrapolated to higher scales. Two different simulants were used in the experiments, i.e., sodium borosilicate glass and CaO-B2O3, to study the effect of melt composition, and it was observed that the coolability behavior remains the same but the melt quenching time varies. The effect of nozzle diameters was studied by conducting experiments with three different nozzle diameters of 8, 12, and 18 mm keeping the same inlet pressure. It was found that the quenching time was higher for the 8-mm-diameter nozzle experiment due to smaller flow rates compared to the others. The experiments were repeated at two inlet water pressures of 0.35 and 0.75 bar(g) for the same nozzle diameter to study their effects on melt coolability. As expected, the quenching time was found to be less for the case of higher inlet pressure. The experimental measurements suggest that the overall average melt pool coolability behavior under bottom flooding was almost the same in all cases. However, each physical parameter affects the melt quenching time required to cool the melt. This average melt quenching time can be optimized using suitable combinations of geometric and physical parameters. The debris sizes and porosities formed during the melt eruption were also measured. The measured porosities ranged between 50% and 60% in all experiments.