ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology
Organized to promote the advancement of knowledge in the use of nuclear science and technologies in the aerospace application. Specialized nuclear-based technologies and applications are needed to advance the state-of-the-art in aerospace design, engineering and operations to explore planetary bodies in our solar system and beyond, plus enhance the safety of air travel, especially high speed air travel. Areas of interest will include but are not limited to the creation of nuclear-based power and propulsion systems, multifunctional materials to protect humans and electronic components from atmospheric, space, and nuclear power system radiation, human factor strategies for the safety and reliable operation of nuclear power and propulsion plants by non-specialized personnel and more.
2021 ANS Winter Meeting and Technology Expo
November 30–December 3, 2021
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Fusion Science and Technology
Animation depicts Hanford’s direct-feed waste treatment process
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management (EM) has released an animated video of the Direct-Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) Program at the Hanford Site near Richland, Wash. The video shows the integrated procedure for treating Hanford’s radioactive tank waste, a process EM says is a key component of its strategic cleanup vision.
View the animation here.
P. Yarsky, Y. Xu, A. Ward, N. Hudson, T. Downar
Nuclear Technology | Volume 197 | Number 3 | March 2017 | Pages 265-283
Technical Paper | dx.doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2016.1273707
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
On November 3, 2008, an unexpected drift of the last three of 177 control rods occurred at the Dresden Unit 3 boiling water reactor. The root cause of the control rod drift was the manner in which the hydraulic control units (HCUs) were isolated during the outage. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) performed a demonstration study of inadvertent control blade drift using RES-sponsored nuclear analysis tools. The smallest margin to recriticality was determined by calculating the control rod worths at each core state using the core simulator PARCS/PATHS and an innovative algorithm to identify the highest worth combination of rods. This study did not try to evaluate any correlation between drifting rods that may occur in a real plant due to the actual physical configuration of the system. The purpose of the analysis was to demonstrate the tools that could be used to analyze the situation if that information is known.
For the current purpose of this demonstration, Edwin Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 3 (H1C3) was selected as the reference core and cycle. Based on the results of these calculations, it was possible to determine the fraction of rod groups that would produce criticality consequences in each of these scenarios. The results confirmed several aspects of conventional thinking, such as the most reactive point being the beginning of the cycle at the coldest conditions. Further, with a single blade drifting out of the core, the analysis results confirm that shutdown margin is maintained. It was found that a small population (about 1%) of drift scenarios with two rods produced criticality consequences according to our best-estimate-plus-uncertainty method, while this fraction increases to about 3.5% for three rods and about 14% for four rods. The results of the study have confirmed the adequacy of the NRC control rod drift analysis methodology; however, the results are not generically applicable and apply only to H1C3.