ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Canada’s General Fusion to become publicly traded company
General Fusion has entered into a definitive business combination agreement with Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. (SVAC) that would make General Fusion the first publicly traded pure-play fusion firm, the company announced on January 22. The business combination is projected to be completed in mid-2026.
J. L. Rempe, K. Y. Suh, F. B. Cheung, S. B. Kim
Nuclear Technology | Volume 161 | Number 3 | March 2008 | Pages 210-267
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT08-A3924
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In-vessel retention (IVR) of core melt is a key severe-accident-management strategy adopted by some operating nuclear power plants and proposed for some advanced light water reactors (LWRs). If there were inadequate cooling during a reactor accident, a significant amount of core material could become molten and relocate to the lower head of the reactor vessel, as happened in the Three Mile Island Unit 2 accident. If it is possible to ensure that the vessel head remains intact so that relocated core materials are retained within the vessel, the enhanced safety associated with these plants can reduce concerns about containment failure and associated risk. For example, the enhanced safety of the advanced 600 MW(electric) pressurized water reactor (AP600) designed by Westinghouse, which relied upon external reactor vessel cooling (ERVC) for IVR, resulted in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approving the design without requiring that certain features common to existing LWRs, such as containment sprays, be safety related. Clearly, ERVC offers the potential to reduce the AP600's construction and operating costs. However, it is not clear that the ERVC proposed for the AP600 could provide sufficient heat removal for higher-power reactors [up to 1500 MW(electric)] without additional enhancements. This paper reviews efforts made and results reported regarding the enhancement of IVR in LWRs. Where appropriate, the paper identifies what additional data or analyses are needed to demonstrate that there is sufficient margin for successful IVR in high-power thermal reactors.