ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Jiyun Zhao, Pradip Saha, Mujid S. Kazimi
Nuclear Technology | Volume 161 | Number 2 | February 2008 | Pages 108-123
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT08-A3917
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Using a three-region supercritical water flow model, the core-wide in-phase stability of the U.S. reference supercritical water-cooled reactor (SCWR) design is investigated. The reactor core is simulated as three channels according to the radial power distribution. A method based on modes (reactivity modes) expansion of neutronic kinetic equations is applied. A constant pressure drop boundary condition between the feedwater pump and the turbine control valve is assumed. Cases with and without water rods heating are studied.It is found that the stability of the U.S. reference SCWR design is sensitive to the flow restrictions in the hot fluid or the steam line. As long as the restriction in the steam line is small, the design will be stable. A pressure loss coefficient of 0.25 is assumed for the exit valve on the steam line in this analysis. With this value, the SCWR is stable with a large margin. It is concluded that the presence of water rods heating will reduce the stability margin and increase the flow rate sensitivity while maintaining the power sensitivity level.The decay ratios for the three density wave oscillation modes, i.e., single hot channel, coupled neutronic out-of-phase and in-phase, are compared at steady-state conditions. It is found that the single hot channel oscillation mode is the most limiting one in the absence of the water rods heating, while the in-phase oscillation mode is most limiting in the presence of water rods heating.