ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The journey of the U.S. fuel cycle
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
While most big journeys begin with a clear objective, they rarely start with an exact knowledge of the route. When commissioning the Lewis and Clark expedition in 1803, President Thomas Jefferson didn’t provide specific “turn right at the big mountain” directions to the Corps of Discovery. He gave goal-oriented instructions: explore the Missouri River, find its source, search for a transcontinental water route to the Pacific, and build scientific and cultural knowledge along the way.
Jefferson left it up to Lewis and Clark to turn his broad, geopolitically motivated guidance into gritty reality.
Similarly, U.S. nuclear policy has begun a journey toward closing the U.S. nuclear fuel cycle. There is a clear signal of support for recycling from the Trump administration, along with growing bipartisan excitement in Congress. Yet the precise path remains unclear.
Dandong Feng, Pavel Hejzlar, Mujid S. Kazimi
Nuclear Technology | Volume 160 | Number 1 | October 2007 | Pages 16-44
Technical Paper | Annular Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT07-A3882
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents steady-state thermal-hydraulic analyses of various lattices of externally and internally cooled annular pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel to identify the geometry that allows the largest possible power density while maintaining or increasing the minimum departure from nucleate boiling ratio (MDNBR) margin in current PWRs. Differences from the typical solid rod fuel are identified, and tools for the analysis are established. These involve an in-house code developed for this purpose and an adaptation of the VIPRE-01 whole-core model using a built-in heated tube option. A 13 × 13 square array that maintains the same assembly dimensions as the current 17 × 17 fuel assembly and keeps the same fuel-to-moderator ratio was identified to achieve the best performance and the largest MDNBR margin. It is demonstrated that with a proportional increase of the core flow rate, the annular fuel allows for an up to 50% power uprate at the same MDNBR margin as in current solid PWR fuel, or for a smaller uprate with larger MDNBR margins. The same uprate was found to be possible if annular fuel is used with a hexagonal lattice, such as in VVER plants. Even at this large power rating, the peak fuel temperature is smaller by hundreds of degrees centigrade than for the solid fuel. Analyses have also shown that the annular fuel is stable against both a power excursion and density wave oscillations and has only small sensitivity to oxide layer growth and manufacturing tolerances. Gap conductance asymmetry (between the inner and outer gaps) was identified as the key issue that will limit the design because gap heat transfer resistance affects the MNDBR, unlike for the solid fuel. The annular fuel MNDBR was also found to be more sensitive to variations in core operating parameters than solid fuel, but this is more than compensated for by a significantly larger MDNBR margin during normal operation.