ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The journey of the U.S. fuel cycle
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
While most big journeys begin with a clear objective, they rarely start with an exact knowledge of the route. When commissioning the Lewis and Clark expedition in 1803, President Thomas Jefferson didn’t provide specific “turn right at the big mountain” directions to the Corps of Discovery. He gave goal-oriented instructions: explore the Missouri River, find its source, search for a transcontinental water route to the Pacific, and build scientific and cultural knowledge along the way.
Jefferson left it up to Lewis and Clark to turn his broad, geopolitically motivated guidance into gritty reality.
Similarly, U.S. nuclear policy has begun a journey toward closing the U.S. nuclear fuel cycle. There is a clear signal of support for recycling from the Trump administration, along with growing bipartisan excitement in Congress. Yet the precise path remains unclear.
Yong Hoon Jeong, Mujid S. Kazimi
Nuclear Technology | Volume 159 | Number 2 | August 2007 | Pages 147-157
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle and Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT07-A3861
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The hybrid sulfur cycle (often called the Westinghouse cycle) for decomposing water into hydrogen and oxygen has two steps. The sulfuric acid is decomposed into steam and sulfur trioxide, which is further decomposed into sulfur dioxide and oxygen at high temperature (~1100 K). Hydrogen is produced by electrolysis of a sulfur dioxide and water mixture at low temperature, which also results in the formation of oxygen and sulfuric acid.In this study, separation of decomposed products and internal heat recuperation are examined, and ways to optimize the energy efficiency of the hybrid cycle are explored by varying the electrolyzer acid concentration, decomposer acid concentration, pressure and temperature of the decomposer, and the internal heat recuperation. The analysis is based on currently available experimental data for the electrode potential.A cycle efficiency of 45.3% [lower heating value (LHV)] appears to be achievable at 1100 K (10 bar, 1100 K, and 60 mol% of H2SO4 for the decomposer, 60 wt% of H2SO4 for the electrolyzer). For a maximum temperature of 1200 K, 50.5% (LHV) appears to be the achievable cycle efficiency (10 bar, 1200 K, and 60 mol% of H2SO4 for the decomposer, 60 wt% of H2SO4 for the electrolyzer). Operation under elevated pressures (70 bar or higher) results in loss of cycle efficiencies due to lower yield of the SO2 in the decomposer but minimizes equipment size and possibly capital cost. However, the loss in efficiency as pressure increases is not large at high temperature (1200 K) compared to that at low temperatures (1000 to 1100 K). Therefore, high-pressure operation for minimizing capital investment would be favored only if the high temperature can be accommodated. The major factors that can affect the cycle efficiency are reducing the electrode overpotential and having structural materials that can accommodate operation at high temperature and high acid concentration.