ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC panel discusses pathway to fusion commercialization
Fusion leaders at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s annual Regulatory Information Conference discussed the path forward for regulating the burgeoning fusion industry. The speakers discussed government and private industry initiatives in the United States and United Kingdom, with a focus on efforts shaping the near-term deployment of commercial fusion machines.
A recurring theme was the need to explain the difference between fission and fusion. Representatives from the Department of Energy and Type One Energy highlighted this as an important distinction for regulators, as it will allow fusion to undergo its own independent maturation process for developing standards and regulations in the same way that fission has. Lea Perlas, Fusion Program director at the Virginia Department of Health, said that confusion between fission and fusion has been a common cause for misplaced concerns among community members surrounding Commonwealth Fusion Systems’ proposed fusion plant site near Richmond, Va.
Hyo-Nam Kim, Ihn Namgung
Nuclear Technology | Volume 195 | Number 1 | July 2016 | Pages 15-28
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NT15-17
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In severe accident conditions, the molten core material forms an internally heated debris bed and eventually becomes a molten pool of corium, which will cause or induce thermal and mechanical loads to the reactor vessel lower head (RVLH) resulting in penetrations leading to failure. A good understanding of the mechanical behavior of the RVLH is essential for estimating structural integrity and improving accident mitigation strategies.
Coupled thermomechanical analysis using ANSYS, a general-purpose finite element method analysis code, was used to evaluate the possibility and timescale of failure. A two-dimensional axisymmetric finite element model was adopted based on APR1400 design data with relevant material properties including creep data.
From the study, it was found that the possibility of plastic and creep failure of the RVLH for the APR1400 was considerably low for a full-core meltdown of the reactor core under ex-vessel cooling conditions with an ambient temperature of 130°C and constant decay heat from the corium, but the lower head may fail unless the increased internal pressure can be reduced on time. Plastic failure can be a major cause of lower head failure of a reactor vessel in high internal pressure conditions and creep failure is not negligible, since failure mechanisms under long-lasting periods are considered. This study found that the APR1400 RVLH failure time is around 220 h using 15% creep strain failure criteria from the postulated accident condition.