ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The journey of the U.S. fuel cycle
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
While most big journeys begin with a clear objective, they rarely start with an exact knowledge of the route. When commissioning the Lewis and Clark expedition in 1803, President Thomas Jefferson didn’t provide specific “turn right at the big mountain” directions to the Corps of Discovery. He gave goal-oriented instructions: explore the Missouri River, find its source, search for a transcontinental water route to the Pacific, and build scientific and cultural knowledge along the way.
Jefferson left it up to Lewis and Clark to turn his broad, geopolitically motivated guidance into gritty reality.
Similarly, U.S. nuclear policy has begun a journey toward closing the U.S. nuclear fuel cycle. There is a clear signal of support for recycling from the Trump administration, along with growing bipartisan excitement in Congress. Yet the precise path remains unclear.
X. Cheng, N. I. Tak
Nuclear Technology | Volume 158 | Number 2 | May 2007 | Pages 229-236
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT158-229
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis is carried out for heat transfer of lead-bismuth eutectic flows in rod bundles. The effect of different parameters, such as turbulence models, on the numerical results is investigated. The effect of meshes on the heat transfer is much smaller when using the [curly epsilon]-type turbulence models than when using the -type turbulence models. Based on the results achieved, the Reynolds stress model of Speziale with fine-mesh structures, i.e., y1+ 15, is recommended for further CFD analysis of heavy liquid-metal (HLM) flows in rod bundles. A strong circumferential nonuniformity of heat transfer is observed in tight rod bundles, especially in square lattices. The secondary flow leads to a reduction in the nonuniformity of heat transfer. Related to the overall average Nusselt number, CFD codes give similar results for both triangular and square rod bundles when the Peclet number and the pitch-to-diameter ratio have the same values in both bundle configurations. Comparison of the CFD results with bundle test data in mercury clearly indicates that the turbulent Prandtl number for HLM flows in rod bundles is smaller than that in circular tubes. It has values close to 1.0 at high Peclet number conditions and increases by decreasing Peclet number.
