ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The journey of the U.S. fuel cycle
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
While most big journeys begin with a clear objective, they rarely start with an exact knowledge of the route. When commissioning the Lewis and Clark expedition in 1803, President Thomas Jefferson didn’t provide specific “turn right at the big mountain” directions to the Corps of Discovery. He gave goal-oriented instructions: explore the Missouri River, find its source, search for a transcontinental water route to the Pacific, and build scientific and cultural knowledge along the way.
Jefferson left it up to Lewis and Clark to turn his broad, geopolitically motivated guidance into gritty reality.
Similarly, U.S. nuclear policy has begun a journey toward closing the U.S. nuclear fuel cycle. There is a clear signal of support for recycling from the Trump administration, along with growing bipartisan excitement in Congress. Yet the precise path remains unclear.
Jiyun Zhao, Pradip Saha, Mujid S. Kazimi
Nuclear Technology | Volume 158 | Number 2 | May 2007 | Pages 174-190
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT07-A3834
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The single hot-channel thermal-hydraulic stability model is expanded to investigate the effects of heat transport from fuel rods and to water rods on supercritical water-cooled reactor (SCWR) stability. Furthermore, the stability margin of the SCWR is compared with that of a typical boiling water reactor (BWR) by conducting a sensitivity study on operating conditions.The fuel thermal-dynamic effect is studied by coupling a lumped-parameter fuel model with the three-region coolant thermal-hydraulics model. It is found that the fuel heat capacity would dampen the oscillations in the coolant channel and therefore increase the stability of the system. Also, heating of the water rods, which could be allowed in the core, would improve single-channel stability.The stability sensitivity to power and flow rate conditions is analyzed for the U.S. reference SCWR design and compared with a typical BWR. The SCWR is found to be more sensitive to power and flow rate changes than the typical BWR. The water rod heating cannot significantly improve this sensitivity feature of the SCWR stability. The traditional stability measure of oscillation amplitude decay ratio does not capture the extent to which a stability margin exists in a particular design of the SCWR. The robustness of stability should be ascertained by examining accommodation of the potential variation and/or uncertainty about the nominal conditions.