ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Hanford begins removing waste from 24th single-shell tank
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management said crews at the Hanford Site near Richland, Wash., have started retrieving radioactive waste from Tank A-106, a 1-million-gallon underground storage tank built in the 1950s.
Tank A-106 will be the 24th single-shell tank that crews have cleaned out at Hanford, which is home to 177 underground waste storage tanks: 149 single-shell tanks and 28 double-shell tanks. Ranging from 55,000 gallons to more than 1 million gallons in capacity, the tanks hold around 56 million gallons of chemical and radioactive waste resulting from plutonium production at the site.
Chenglong Wang, Kaichao Sun, Lin-Wen Hu, Suizheng Qiu, G. H. Su
Nuclear Technology | Volume 196 | Number 1 | October 2016 | Pages 34-52
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NT15-42
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The technology for the 20-MW(thermal) Transportable Fluoride Salt–Cooled High-Temperature Reactor (TFHR) is proposed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology for off-grid applications such as Antarctic bases and remote mining sites. The preliminary thermal-hydraulic analyses and improvements based on a 1/12th full-core model were performed using three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD). A benchmark study was conducted by comparing the CFD results against empirical correlations and experimental data obtained by Cooke, Silverman, and Grele. In the 1/12th full-core analysis, three practical considerations that may challenge the TFHR temperature limits are evaluated as bounding analysis. These include (1) helium gap between fuel compact and graphite block, (2) thermal conductivity degradations of graphite matrix due to neutron irradiation, and (3) full-core scale power distribution obtained from neutronic calculations. These design considerations lead to insufficient margin between the normal operating condition and the predefined thermal limits. In this context, additional design features are implemented to improve the thermal-hydraulic safety of the TFHR. First, bypass flow in the interstitial gaps between the active core and the reflector is found capable of reducing the temperature peaks at the core periphery. Second, improvements of the flow distribution from the central downcomer to individual coolant channels enable a higher mass flow rate to the regions with compromised cooling access. Overall, thermal-hydraulic performance was significantly improved with a fuel temperature margin from 10 to 150 K and a coolant temperature margin from 16 to 160 K, as well as the more uniform temperature distribution across the reactor core. Furthermore, thermal-hydraulic safety can be maintained at a 20% overpower operating condition [i.e., 24 MW(thermal)]. Overall, this study provides an engineering basis for the TFHR thermal-hydraulic design to improve its safety margin.