ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The journey of the U.S. fuel cycle
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
While most big journeys begin with a clear objective, they rarely start with an exact knowledge of the route. When commissioning the Lewis and Clark expedition in 1803, President Thomas Jefferson didn’t provide specific “turn right at the big mountain” directions to the Corps of Discovery. He gave goal-oriented instructions: explore the Missouri River, find its source, search for a transcontinental water route to the Pacific, and build scientific and cultural knowledge along the way.
Jefferson left it up to Lewis and Clark to turn his broad, geopolitically motivated guidance into gritty reality.
Similarly, U.S. nuclear policy has begun a journey toward closing the U.S. nuclear fuel cycle. There is a clear signal of support for recycling from the Trump administration, along with growing bipartisan excitement in Congress. Yet the precise path remains unclear.
Luis E. Herranz, C. L. del Prá, A. Dehbi
Nuclear Technology | Volume 158 | Number 1 | April 2007 | Pages 83-93
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT07-A3827
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Postulated accident sequences of a pressurized water reactor, consisting of steam generator tube ruptures (SGTRs) in combination with a melting core, have been demonstrated to represent a dominant contribution to the overall public risk. However, it should be expected that even in the absence of any water in the secondary side of the steam generator ("dry" SGTR scenario), some radioactivity retention takes place as a result of the interaction of the carrier gas with internal structures. The region near the tube breach becomes a key region because it behaves as a sink for the radioactive particles entering the secondary side, and consequently, it changes size distribution of aerosols flowing toward upper structures.This paper identifies major issues that should be addressed to accurately estimate aerosol retention in the field near a tube breach during dry SGTR scenarios. By developing a simple Lagrangian model based on the filter-concept approach (ARISG-I), the specific aspects of fluid dynamics and aerosol physics involved have been explored and the major knowledge gaps highlighted.Inertial impaction and turbulent deposition have been demonstrated to be major particle removal mechanisms. Their respective collection efficiencies have been derived by gathering and correlating separate effect data on particle deposition on cylinders in a crossflow configuration. Comparisons of model predictions to experimental data taken in a mock-up facility of the break stage under similar conditions to those anticipated in dry SGTR scenarios have been set. The substantial discrepancies found and their analysis have provided insights into the significance of drawbacks of model fundamentals, the inaccuracy of specific equations of deposition mechanisms, and most importantly, the lack of consideration of key phenomena that hinder aerosol retention.According to this analysis the main areas where research is needed are: gas jet behavior across the tube bank; particle resuspension, erosion, and/or bouncing; and particle inertial impaction and turbulent deposition under foreseen conditions.