ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
Sang Lung Chan
Nuclear Technology | Volume 156 | Number 2 | November 2006 | Pages 191-212
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3785
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is consolidating all its severe-accident codes into one code, MELCOR, and making an effort to bring it into a state of parity with SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.3 (S/R5/M3.3) to model a Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2)-like accident. In this regard, this cooperative research project seeks to help the NRC to assess S/R5/M3.3 associated with case studies of the TMI-2 lower-head creep rupture. The results of the simulations clearly demonstrate that the TMI-2 lower-head failure occurs. Thus, solely using the S/R5/M3.3 models of the molten pool and debris-to-vessel contact resistance, without implementing the gap cooling model, cannot explain the conservation of the TMI-2 lower head during the accident. These studies also conclude that the results calculated with the UNIX and Microsoft PC versions of S/R5/M3.3 are comparable, and hydrogen productions as well as lower-head creep ruptures vary with different time steps for the alternative accident. Further, those results for the base case and alternative accident are alike; thus, the models cannot differentiate between the base-case and alternative accident scenarios.