ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC unveils Part 53 final rule
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has finalized its new regulatory framework for advanced reactors that officials believe will accelerate, simplify, and reduce burdens in the new reactor licensing process.
The final rule arrives more than a year ahead of an end-of-2027 deadline set in the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (NEIMA), the 2019 law that formally directed the NRC to develop a new, technology-inclusive regulatory approach. The resulting rule—10 CFR Part 53, “Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors”—is commonly referred to as Part 53.
Sang Lung Chan
Nuclear Technology | Volume 156 | Number 2 | November 2006 | Pages 191-212
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3785
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is consolidating all its severe-accident codes into one code, MELCOR, and making an effort to bring it into a state of parity with SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.3 (S/R5/M3.3) to model a Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2)-like accident. In this regard, this cooperative research project seeks to help the NRC to assess S/R5/M3.3 associated with case studies of the TMI-2 lower-head creep rupture. The results of the simulations clearly demonstrate that the TMI-2 lower-head failure occurs. Thus, solely using the S/R5/M3.3 models of the molten pool and debris-to-vessel contact resistance, without implementing the gap cooling model, cannot explain the conservation of the TMI-2 lower head during the accident. These studies also conclude that the results calculated with the UNIX and Microsoft PC versions of S/R5/M3.3 are comparable, and hydrogen productions as well as lower-head creep ruptures vary with different time steps for the alternative accident. Further, those results for the base case and alternative accident are alike; thus, the models cannot differentiate between the base-case and alternative accident scenarios.