ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The journey of the U.S. fuel cycle
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
While most big journeys begin with a clear objective, they rarely start with an exact knowledge of the route. When commissioning the Lewis and Clark expedition in 1803, President Thomas Jefferson didn’t provide specific “turn right at the big mountain” directions to the Corps of Discovery. He gave goal-oriented instructions: explore the Missouri River, find its source, search for a transcontinental water route to the Pacific, and build scientific and cultural knowledge along the way.
Jefferson left it up to Lewis and Clark to turn his broad, geopolitically motivated guidance into gritty reality.
Similarly, U.S. nuclear policy has begun a journey toward closing the U.S. nuclear fuel cycle. There is a clear signal of support for recycling from the Trump administration, along with growing bipartisan excitement in Congress. Yet the precise path remains unclear.
Te-Chuan Wang, Shih-Jen Wang, Jyh-Tong Teng
Nuclear Technology | Volume 156 | Number 2 | November 2006 | Pages 133-139
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3779
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
After the Three Mile Island accident, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission requested that nuclear power plants (NPPs) in the United States provide instruments to record reactor water levels. The instruments will improve reliability in diagnosing the approach of inadequate core cooling. The reactor vessel level indicating system (RVLIS) is a measuring system for determining the water level in the reactor vessel. RVLIS was installed at Maanshan NPP under this requirement. A station blackout (SBO) incident occurred in the Maanshan NPP on March 18, 2001. The SBO incident was simulated with the MELCOR 1.8.5 code. The important parameter, reactor vessel water level, was compared with plant data. The interesting phenomena about RVLIS responses included initial full water level above 100%, reactor pressure vessel (RPV) water shrinkage, and two peaks in upper range train A. The initial full water levels of the upper range were at ~112% because of calibration conditions. The two trains of the upper range dropped at ~1.2 h after SBO because of RPV water saturation. RVLIS upper range train A had two level rises after SBO because of two flows out of the pressurizer into the loop 2 hot leg. The results indicated that MELCOR could reproduce the RVLIS response very well.