ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The journey of the U.S. fuel cycle
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
While most big journeys begin with a clear objective, they rarely start with an exact knowledge of the route. When commissioning the Lewis and Clark expedition in 1803, President Thomas Jefferson didn’t provide specific “turn right at the big mountain” directions to the Corps of Discovery. He gave goal-oriented instructions: explore the Missouri River, find its source, search for a transcontinental water route to the Pacific, and build scientific and cultural knowledge along the way.
Jefferson left it up to Lewis and Clark to turn his broad, geopolitically motivated guidance into gritty reality.
Similarly, U.S. nuclear policy has begun a journey toward closing the U.S. nuclear fuel cycle. There is a clear signal of support for recycling from the Trump administration, along with growing bipartisan excitement in Congress. Yet the precise path remains unclear.
Hilbert Christensen
Nuclear Technology | Volume 155 | Number 3 | September 2006 | Pages 358-364
Technical Paper | Materials for Nuclear Systems | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3768
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A previously developed radiolysis model has been used to simulate experiments from four laboratories. The source strengths in the experiments with UO2, doped with 238Pu, were 0.01, 0.1, and 1 Ci/g. The agreement was good with the experimental results of Stroes-Gascoyne et al. for their sample with 0.1 Ci/g. Their sample containing 0.01 Ci/g gave a factor-of-3-higher calculated corrosion rate compared with the experimental rate. In the experiments of Cobos et al. and of Kelm and Bohnert, using alpha-doped UO2, the calculated corrosion rates were somewhat lower than the experimental rates. However, recent experiments by Rondinella et al. using UO2 with 10% doped 233U gave considerably lower corrosion rates in good agreement with the model. The calculated corrosion rates for the same source strength were about the same for the experiments by Stroes-Gascoyne et al., Kelm and Bohnert, and Cobos et al. However, the experimental rates varied considerably. The agreement was not good with experiments using Pu(VI) dissolved in solution, in which case the calculated corrosion rate was ten times or more than ten times lower than the experimental rate. The reason for this disagreement could be a chemical effect of Pu(VI) in the solution.