ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Hanford begins removing waste from 24th single-shell tank
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management said crews at the Hanford Site near Richland, Wash., have started retrieving radioactive waste from Tank A-106, a 1-million-gallon underground storage tank built in the 1950s.
Tank A-106 will be the 24th single-shell tank that crews have cleaned out at Hanford, which is home to 177 underground waste storage tanks: 149 single-shell tanks and 28 double-shell tanks. Ranging from 55,000 gallons to more than 1 million gallons in capacity, the tanks hold around 56 million gallons of chemical and radioactive waste resulting from plutonium production at the site.
Ketan Mittal, Ahti Suo-Anttila, Miles Greiner
Nuclear Technology | Volume 192 | Number 2 | November 2015 | Pages 142-154
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste Management and Disposal | doi.org/10.13182/NT14-156
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The fire time of concern for a component within a used nuclear fuel transport package is the time after fire ignition when that component reaches its temperature of concern. In this work a legal weight truck package that is designed to transport one used pressurized water reactor fuel assembly is assumed to be in proximity to a 12-m-diameter jet propellant fuel pool fire. Container Analysis Fire Environment (CAFE) simulations are used to predict the fire times of concern for the fuel cladding, seal, lead gamma shield, and liquid neutron shield of the package, for different package locations relative to the fire under no-wind conditions. When the package was centered over the pool, the CAFE-predicted time of concern for the cladding to reach its possible burst rupture temperature (nominally 750°C) was between 11.8 and 13.3 h, depending on the modeling parameter values and mesh refinement. As the package was moved away from the pool center, the cladding time of concern increased, and its in-fire steady-state temperature (reached after being exposed to the fire for a long time) decreased. The cladding did not reach its temperature of concern when the package center was 6 m from the pool center (above the pool edge), even in infinitely long-lasting fires. This type of analysis can be used to determine a “safe distance” between the pool and package centers, beyond which certain components important to safety will not reach their temperature of concern, no matter how long a fire lasts. This will help risk analysts determine which accident scenarios can significantly affect public and environmental safety and those that cannot.