ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC looks to leverage previous approvals for large LWRs
During this time of resurging interest in nuclear power, many conversations have centered on one fundamental problem: Electricity is needed now, but nuclear projects (in recent decades) have taken many years to get permitted and built.
In the past few years, a bevy of new strategies have been pursued to fix this problem. Workforce programs that seek to laterally transition skilled people from other industries, plans to reuse the transmission infrastructure at shuttered coal sites, efforts to restart plants like Palisades or Duane Arnold, new reactor designs that build on the legacy of research done in the early days of atomic power—all of these plans share a common throughline: leveraging work already done instead of starting over from square one to get new plants designed and built.
Charles Forsberg, Per F. Peterson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 191 | Number 2 | August 2015 | Pages 113-121
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT14-88
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The fluoride salt–cooled high-temperature reactor (FHR) is a new reactor type that combines the graphite-matrix coated-particle fuel and graphite moderator from high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs) with a clean liquid fluoride salt coolant. No FHR has yet been built. The proposed fuel cycle is a once-through fuel cycle—essentially identical to that of HTGRs. There is the option of adopting closed fuel cycles. Relative to light water reactor (LWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF), all graphite-matrix coated-particle SNFs share the common characteristics of superior proliferation resistance and long-term performance as a waste form in a geological repository. The allowable HTGR and FHR SNF storage temperatures are much higher than allowable LWR SNF storage temperatures. These SNF characteristics are (a) a consequence of the high-temperature fuel form with a graphite matrix and SiC coating of the fuel microspheres and (b) to a first-order approximation independent of the reactor type in which the fuel is used.
There are differences. The FHR reactor core power density is four to ten times higher than in an HTGR, so the short-term decay heat of the SNF per unit volume upon discharge is four to ten times higher. The volume of FHR SNF is one-half to one-third that of an HTGR per unit energy output because (a) the salt provides some neutron moderation thus reducing the carbon-to-uranium ratio of the fuel and (b) the economic optimization with higher power densities increases the fuel loading. The FHR SNF volume is about four times that of a LWR per unit of electricity. The coolant generates significant tritium that is partly absorbed by the graphite and can be partly desorbed at higher temperatures. Last, any residual solid salt coolant with the SNF at low temperatures can undergo radiolysis with the potential generation of fluorine gas. The presence of the salt coolant on the SNF and graphite moderator will require treatment, removal of residual coolant salt, or demonstration that the small quantities of radiolysis products of frozen salt do not impact long-term performance of storage or disposal facilities.