ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Lawrence N. Oji, Keisha B. Martin, Mary E. Stallings, Martine C. Duff
Nuclear Technology | Volume 154 | Number 2 | May 2006 | Pages 237-246
Technical Paper | Reprocessing | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3731
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The laboratory conditions used to synthesize the uranyl silicate minerals are almost identical to the evaporator conditions under which high caustic nuclear wastes are processed to reduce total liquid waste volume. The only significant difference is in the sodium ion concentration in such caustic nuclear wastes, which typically averages ~5.6 M Na+. The goal of this study was to experimentally determine whether uranium silicate minerals can be produced under nuclear waste evaporator conditions. If the formation of these uranium minerals is possible, it may not only lead to the clogging of the evaporators but also result in the accumulation of fissile 235U and thus present a criticality problem.In this investigation, synthetic uranyl silicate minerals (sodium weeksite, sodium boltwoodite, and uranophane) were produced only under low Na+ concentration (<0.02 M), while attempts to synthesize these same uranyl silicate minerals in the presence of high Na+ concentration (high ionic strength reacting media), which is typical of caustic nuclear waste evaporator processing conditions, proved unfruitful. In the presence of high Na+ concentration, the main product for the same soluble silica-uranium reaction mixture shifts toward the formation of mainly clarkeite (Na[(UO2)O(OH)](H2O)0-1), a hydrated sodium uranate, and not toward the formation of uranyl silicates.Thus, the presence of high Na+ concentration in the reaction mixture of dissolved uranium and silica inhibits or suppresses the formation of crystalline uranyl silicates. The conclusion is therefore made that evaporator fouling by uranyl silicate minerals is not easily attained under nuclear waste processing conditions because of the high Na+ concentration in the liquid wastes.