ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Xu Cheng, Abdalla Batta, Nam-Il Tak
Nuclear Technology | Volume 154 | Number 1 | April 2006 | Pages 1-12
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3714
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experimental and numerical studies on the flow behavior in a prototypical configuration of spallation targets have been performed, with the main purpose being to support the target design and to assess the computational fluid dynamics application. The effects of flow direction, presence of a perforated plate, and turbulence models on the flow behavior are investigated. Good agreement is obtained between the experimental data and the numerical results, except for the case of downward flow without a perforated plate, where large flow recirculation occurs beneath the window. For the numerical simulation of the flow behavior in the complex target geometries investigated, the shear stress transport model does not show advantages over the k-[curly epsilon] model.