ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Xu Cheng, Abdalla Batta, Nam-Il Tak
Nuclear Technology | Volume 154 | Number 1 | April 2006 | Pages 1-12
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3714
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experimental and numerical studies on the flow behavior in a prototypical configuration of spallation targets have been performed, with the main purpose being to support the target design and to assess the computational fluid dynamics application. The effects of flow direction, presence of a perforated plate, and turbulence models on the flow behavior are investigated. Good agreement is obtained between the experimental data and the numerical results, except for the case of downward flow without a perforated plate, where large flow recirculation occurs beneath the window. For the numerical simulation of the flow behavior in the complex target geometries investigated, the shear stress transport model does not show advantages over the k-[curly epsilon] model.