ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
J. Jayaraj, K. Thyagarajan, C. Mallika, U. Kamachi Mudali
Nuclear Technology | Volume 191 | Number 1 | July 2015 | Pages 58-70
Technical Paper | Reprocessing | doi.org/10.13182/NT14-90
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Long-term corrosion testing of a mock-up dissolver vessel to be employed in the aqueous reprocessing of spent nuclear fuels of fast breeder reactors has been initiated. In this work, a Zircaloy-4 (Zr-4) mock-up dissolver vessel was used as the testing facility to evaluate the corrosion rate of several candidate materials based on zirconium and titanium in the boiling and vapor phases of simulated dissolver solution (SDS) comprising fission and corrosion product ions in 11.5 M nitric acid. Several campaigns of 100, 250, 500, 1000, and 2500 h of operation were completed. The corrosion rates of the candidate materials are expressed both in micrometers per year (μm/yr) and mils per year (mils/yr). Zirconium-702, Zr-4, autoclaved Zr-4, and commercial pure titanium (CP-Ti) exhibited low corrosion rates of 0.08 to 0.23 μm/yr (0.003 to 0.009 mils/yr) in the as-received and welded conditions exposed to the boiling liquid phase of the dissolver solution for 2500 h. Whereas the CP-Ti and CP-Ti weld exhibited marginally higher corrosion rates of 1.0 μm/yr (0.04 mils/yr) and 1.9 μm/yr (0.075 mils/yr), respectively, in the vapor phase of the dissolver solution, the lowest corrosion rate of 0.08 μm/yr (0.003 mils/yr) was obtained for the autoclaved Zr-4 sample exposed to boiling SDS. Scanning electron microscope investigations did not reveal any corrosion attack for the titanium and zirconium samples. Laser Raman spectroscopic analysis confirmed that the origins of passivity of zirconium and titanium samples were due to the formation of ZrO2 and TiO2, respectively. However, the CP-Ti/AISI Type 304L stainless steel (SS 304L) and Zr-4/SS 304L dissimilar welds had undergone severe corrosion. Visual inspection of the Zr-4 dissolver vessel revealed no corrosion attack after operation for 2500 h. The results of this 2500-h campaign would serve as the baseline data for the analysis of future long-term campaigns.
