ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Heba K. Louis
Nuclear Technology | Volume 188 | Number 1 | October 2014 | Pages 1-7
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT13-120
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The lifetime of prompt neutrons is a basic characteristic of reactors since it determines the neutron kinetics of the reactor in all transient processes. This paper focuses on calculation of the prompt neutron lifetime for pressurized water reactors (PWRs). The calculation was performed using two independent methods. The first method uses the fundamental definition of the neutron lifetime with adjoint weighting that has recently been included in MCNPX. The second method is the 1/v absorber insertion method, where a 1/v absorber such as 10B is placed uniformly throughout a nuclear reactor and the change in reactivity is calculated. This prompt neutron lifetime is then extracted from the changes in the reactivity as the 10B concentration approaches zero. The results of the two methods are compared together at two points in the operation cycle [at beginning of cycle (BOC) and at end of cycle (EOC)]. The values of the prompt neutron lifetime as calculated with MCNPX are compared to values calculated with another independent method, and the results are in reasonable agreement with each other. Also, these results compared with the PWR final safety analysis report show good agreement. In the two methods of calculation, the prompt neutron lifetime was determined to be longer at EOC when compared to that at BOC.