ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Wang-Kee In, Tae-Hyun Chun
Nuclear Technology | Volume 150 | Number 3 | June 2005 | Pages 231-250
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT05-A3619
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis has been performed to assess the Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models to predict a turbulent flow and heat transfer in a triangular rod bundle with pitch-to-diameter ratios (P/Ds) of 1.06 and 1.12. The CFD predictions using various turbulence models were compared with experimental results. Anisotropic turbulence models such as the nonlinear k - [curly epsilon] and the second-order closure models predicted the turbulence-driven secondary flow in the triangular channel and the distributions of the time mean velocity and temperature showing significantly improved agreement with the measurements from the linear standard k - [curly epsilon] model. The anisotropic turbulence models predicted the turbulence structure for a rod bundle with a large P/D fairly well but could not predict the very high turbulence intensity of the azimuthal velocity observed in the narrow flow region (gap) for a rod bundle with a small P/D.