ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Glass strategy: Hanford’s enhanced waste glass program
The mission of the Department of Energy’s Office of River Protection (ORP) is to complete the safe cleanup of waste resulting from decades of nuclear weapons development. One of the most technologically challenging responsibilities is the safe disposition of approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive waste historically stored in 177 tanks at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
ORP has a clear incentive to reduce the overall mission duration and cost. One pathway is to develop and deploy innovative technical solutions that can advance baseline flow sheets toward higher efficiency operations while reducing identified risks without compromising safety. Vitrification is the baseline process that will convert both high-level and low-level radioactive waste at Hanford into a stable glass waste form for long-term storage and disposal.
Although vitrification is a mature technology, there are key areas where technology can further reduce operational risks, advance baseline processes to maximize waste throughput, and provide the underpinning to enhance operational flexibility; all steps in reducing mission duration and cost.
Manuel Lorenzo Sentís
Nuclear Technology | Volume 187 | Number 2 | August 2014 | Pages 117-130
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT13-84
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
FORGE (Fate of Repository Gases) is an international research project supported by funding under the European Commission FP7 Euratom program and lasting four years from 2009 to 2013. The project is dedicated to understanding gas generation and migration as part of the quantitative assessment of a geological repository for radioactive waste. Within the FORGE project, Work Package 1 is dedicated to numerical modeling of a two-phase flow system (hydrogen gas due to corrosion and groundwater) in a geological repository for radioactive waste. Several benchmark exercises were proposed that cover the modeling of a deep geological repository from the disposal cell scale to the repository scale with different codes. During the definition of the exercises, special emphasis was given to the roles of the excavation-disturbed zone and of the interfaces between materials, which could act as a conduit for preferential flow. Some changes were made in the TOUGH2 code to enable the implementation of the prescribed conditions, models, and parameters of the benchmark. The results of the calculations performed with different codes show that TOUGH2 gives comparable results under the numerically challenging conditions defined in the exercise. Some differences were observed resulting from the use of different codes and also from some simplifications in the parameters and models adopted by the participating teams. In this paper, the cell-scale benchmark exercise and the results obtained by the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI) with TOUGH2 will be described, together with some difficulties encountered during the simulation, e.g., convergence problems. The results of other teams participating in the benchmark are in good agreement with the ENSI results.