ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology
Organized to promote the advancement of knowledge in the use of nuclear science and technologies in the aerospace application. Specialized nuclear-based technologies and applications are needed to advance the state-of-the-art in aerospace design, engineering and operations to explore planetary bodies in our solar system and beyond, plus enhance the safety of air travel, especially high speed air travel. Areas of interest will include but are not limited to the creation of nuclear-based power and propulsion systems, multifunctional materials to protect humans and electronic components from atmospheric, space, and nuclear power system radiation, human factor strategies for the safety and reliable operation of nuclear power and propulsion plants by non-specialized personnel and more.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NEI chief executive highlights “unlimited potential” for nuclear in state of the industry address
Korsnick
In the Nuclear Energy Institute’s annual State of the Nuclear Energy Industry report, NEI president and CEO and Maria Korsnick expressed optimism about the nuclear industry and she issued a call to action.
Her address was part of NEI’s Nuclear Energy Policy forum. The forum, being held in Washington, D.C., on May 20 and May 21, brings together industry leaders, policy stakeholders, and clean energy experts to discuss nuclear advocacy. Korsnick’s remarks focused on the private capital flowing into the industry, progress on regulatory reform and new nuclear technology, and how the U.S. is trying to take the lead on the global nuclear stage.
“We are here at an unprecedented time in our industry history,” Korsnick said. “I’m proud to say that the nuclear industry has a future of unlimited potential.”
Kevan D. Weaver, Philip E. MacDonald
Nuclear Technology | Volume 147 | Number 3 | September 2004 | Pages 457-469
Technical Paper | Medium-Power Lead-Alloy Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT04-A3542
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Various methods have been proposed to transmute and thus consume the current inventory of transuranic waste from spent light water reactor (LWR) fuel and plutonium from weapons. We discuss the neutronics performance of nonfertile, fertile metallic, and fertile nitride fuels loaded with 20 to 30 wt% LWR-grade plutonium plus minor actinides and burned in an open-lattice lead-alloy-cooled fast reactor, with an emphasis on the fuel cycle life and spent fuel isotopic content. As a comparison, similar fuel was also studied in a sodium-cooled fast reactor. Our calculations show that the average actinide burn rate for fertile-free fuel is similar for both the sodium- and lead-bismuth-cooled cases, ranging from 1.02 to 1.16 g/MWd, compared to a typical LWR actinide generation rate of 0.303 g/MWd. In addition, our calculations show that the effective full-power days (EFPDs) of operation (or equivalent reactivity-limited burnup) using fertile fuel can extend beyond 20 yr, and the average actinide burn rate is similar for both the sodium- and lead-bismuth-cooled cases, ranging from 0.5 to 0.9 g/MWd. Using the same parameters (i.e., a large pitch-to-diameter ratio, same linear power, and fissile/fertile loading, etc.), the lead-alloy-cooled cases had an EFPD that was 18% to several times greater than their sodium-cooled counterparts. However, tight sodium-cooled lattices are equivalent to the looser lead-alloy lattices in terms of beginning-of-life excess reactivity.