ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
Ferenc Adorján, Toshio Morita
Nuclear Technology | Volume 118 | Number 3 | June 1997 | Pages 264-275
Technical Paper | Reactor Control | doi.org/10.13182/NT97-A35367
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Recently, continuous power reactor core surveillance, which is based on fixed in-core detector readings, has exhibited a trend of growing significance. The fixed in-core sensors can only be replaced during shutdown periods; therefore, it is important to have reliable information on the quality of each detector in advance to be able to create an appropriate detector replacement schedule. During the operating cycle, the continuous core surveillance system should rely only on reliable measurements, and only an effective detector failure diagnosis can ensure avoiding falsified information. At the same time, most published signal validation methods are not well suited for an extensive set of fixed in-core detectors. A relatively simple, though powerful and robust, method is proposed that can be applied for both signal validation and early failure detection. The basic idea of the method is that inevitably there exist such process noise components in the detector signals that are characteristically correlated within some well-determined groups of sensors. The lack of such correlation most probably occurs due to some detector failure. When a smaller, localized subgroup of the detectors shows a decreased level of correlation with the majority, that is typically caused by some abnormal event in the technological process. In such cases the results of this method can be utilized as a target identification tool for the more sophisticated noise diagnostics methods. The method has been thoroughly tested with an extensive data set, including rhodium self-powered neutron detectors and assembly outlet thermocouple signals, which was collected throughout a complete operational cycle of a VVER-440/213-type pressurized water reactor.