ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Curt M. Betts, Mark R. Galvin, Janet R. Green,† V. Melvin Guymon, Stephen M. Slater,‡, Andrew C. Klein
Nuclear Technology | Volume 105 | Number 3 | March 1994 | Pages 395-410
Technical Paper | Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT94-A34939
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Currently, no comprehensive mechanistic model for the two-phase flow through a swirl vane steam separator is available. Therefore, an attempt has been made to develop an analytical model, using fundamental fluid mechanics, which is capable of predicting separator performance over a wide range of conditions. The developed model subdivides a typical boiling water reactor swirl vane steam separator into four distinct regions: the standpipe region, the swirl vane region, the transition region, and the free vortex region. In each region, the vapor and liquid components are treated separately and the behavior of individual droplets is determined from the drag force induced by the vapor continuum. The analytical model is used to first determine the vapor velocities throughout the separator. The drag force on the droplets is then determined, and the droplets are tracked through the separator in order to determine the exit position of each droplet. Separator performance can then be determined from this final position in terms of the fraction of droplets removed from the flow stream. In order to assess the validity of this model, the computer code SEPARATOR was developed. Among other capabilities, the code is capable of determining separator performance in terms of carryover, carryunder, and exit quality. However, due to the simplicity of the single-phase fluid treatment of the vapor continuum and the lack of data related to the average droplet diameter for flows of this nature, the results are not of significant quantitative value. The investigation performed does, however, suggest that the developed methodology, upon refinement of the single-phase fluids treatment, will yield quantitatively accurate results for nearly all separator operating conditions of interest.