ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Mirion announces appointments
Mirion Technologies has announced three senior leadership appointments designed to support its global nuclear and medical businesses while advancing a company-wide digital and AI strategy. The leadership changes come as Mirion seeks to advance innovation and maintain strong performance in nuclear energy, radiation safety, and medical applications.
Anna A. Afanasieva, Evgeniy V. Burlakov, Alexander V. Krayushkin, Andre V. Kubarev
Nuclear Technology | Volume 103 | Number 1 | July 1993 | Pages 1-9
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A34825
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
When the causes of the accident at Chernobyl Unit 4 on April 26, 1986, were studied, particular attention was given to the positive void reactivity coefficient and the dynamic characteristics of the shutdown system. The role of these factors in the development of the accident is discussed. The physical nature of the void reactivity coefficient is considered. Safety measures added to the remaining RBMK-type reactors are described. These measures include installation of 80 stationary neutron absorbers in the core to decrease the void reactivity coefficient as well as modification of the absorber rods. The results of reactor parameter measurements after these measures were implemented are presented. The calculation methods are outlined, and the changes in the neutron physics characteristics after the Chernobyl accident are described. The measures taken to improve the safety of RBMK reactors preclude the possibility of another accident of the Chernobyl type. Possible further improvements in the operation of an RBMK reactor are discussed.