ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Young Members Group
The Young Members Group works to encourage and enable all young professional members to be actively involved in the efforts and endeavors of the Society at all levels (Professional Divisions, ANS Governance, Local Sections, etc.) as they transition from the role of a student to the role of a professional. It sponsors non-technical workshops and meetings that provide professional development and networking opportunities for young professionals, collaborates with other Divisions and Groups in developing technical and non-technical content for topical and national meetings, encourages its members to participate in the activities of the Groups and Divisions that are closely related to their professional interests as well as in their local sections, introduces young members to the rules and governance structure of the Society, and nominates young professionals for awards and leadership opportunities available to members.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Smarter waste strategies: Helping deliver on the promise of advanced nuclear
At COP28, held in Dubai in 2023, a clear consensus emerged: Nuclear energy must be a cornerstone of the global clean energy transition. With electricity demand projected to soar as we decarbonize not just power but also industry, transport, and heat, the case for new nuclear is compelling. More than 20 countries committed to tripling global nuclear capacity by 2050. In the United States alone, the Department of Energy forecasts that the country’s current nuclear capacity could more than triple, adding 200 GW of new nuclear to the existing 95 GW by mid-century.
Robert E. Henry, James P. Burelbach, Robert J. Hammersley, Christopher E. Henry, George T. Klopp
Nuclear Technology | Volume 101 | Number 3 | March 1993 | Pages 385-399
Technical Paper | Severe Accident Technology / Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A34795
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Under severe accident conditions, the most crucial action for recovery from the accident state is to cool the core debris and prevent or terminate attack on the remaining fission product barriers. One means of preventing attack on the containment structures is to retain the core debris within the reactor vessel. The Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) accident demonstrated that this could be accomplished by water resident within the reactor vessel combined with injection on a continual basis to quench the debris and remove decay heat over the long term. Some accident situations could result in the transport of molten core debris to the lower plenum, as occurred to some extent (∼20 tonnes) during the TMI-2 accident, boiloff of water in the lower plenum, and an inability to add water to the reactor coolant system (RCS). In this extreme set of circumstances, sufficient external reactor pressure vessel (RPV) cooling may be available to prevent failure of the RPV lower head and, thereby, retain the core debris within the vessel. Containment configurations like Zion would result in substantial accumulation of water around the lower parts of the reactor vessel for most accident sequences. For some pressurized water reactor containments, there could be substantial water accumulation around the reactor vessel and the hot and cold legs before core damage and drainage of debris to the lower plenum. If this water could directly contact the carbon steel vessel surface and RCS piping, substantial energy could be removed from the primary system and in particular the RPV lower head. The experiments, which were performed in support of the Commonwealth Edison individual plant examination and accident management programs, are heat transfer tests designed to demonstrate that nucleate boiling is the dominant heat removal process from the outer surface of a simulated RPV lower head surrounded by typical reflective insulation used in nuclear power plants. With this heat removal mechanism on the outer surface, the heat flux is limited by thermal conduction through the carbon steel head, both for the experiments and for a reactor system. Experiments were performed in which the reactor vessel lower head was simulated with a 0.32-m (12.75-in.)-o.d. pipe cap. Wall thicknesses of 1.75 cm (0.688 in.) and 3.3 cm (1.312 in.) were used to provide substantially different heat fluxes to the outer surface. The heat source was molten iron thermite at a temperature of ∼2400 K, which was poured onto the dry inner surface of the lower head. Water provided cooling on the outer surface. Both uninsulated and insulated configurations were investigated. The measured heat fluxes were essentially the same for these two different cases. This clearly demonstrates that the water flow rate through the insulation is sufficient to supply cooling water to the RPV outer surface under such accident conditions. In addition, the measured heat fluxes are well in excess of those that can be attributed to film boiling. Hence, the vessel outer surface was cooled by nucleate boiling during the entire transient.