ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Hot Fuel Examination Facility named a Nuclear Historic Landmark
The American Nuclear Society recently announced the designation of three new nuclear historic landmarks: the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), the Neely Nuclear Research Center, and the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant. Today’s article, the first in a three-part series, will focus on the historical significance of HFEF.
Ki-Yong Ra, Byong-Whi Lee, Soon-Heung Chang
Nuclear Technology | Volume 101 | Number 2 | February 1993 | Pages 149-158
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A34776
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
With most of the current probabilistic safety criteria (PSCs), it is difficult to select a unanimously acceptable single-point safety goal and to evaluate the uncertainties in the results of a probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). A new PSC is proposed, in which the distribution of the public’s safety goals (DPSG) is used as a benchmark for evaluating the results of a PSA rather than a single-point safety goal. With this approach, the DPSG and the uncertainties in the results of a PSA can be handled properly so as to give a clear answer of “how much of the public feels a nuclear reactor is safe” to the question of “How safe is safe enough?” The proposed PSC is compared with the current PSCs and the expected utility model. If the actual DPSG is unavailable or difficult to obtain directly, a lognormal distribution is recommended as an appropriate DPSG for core melt frequencies in terms of maximizing entropy and minimizing total social cost. The proposed DPSG and PSC for core melt frequency are applied to the results of NUREG-1150.