ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Shao-Rong Wu, Klaus Rehme
Nuclear Technology | Volume 89 | Number 1 | January 1990 | Pages 103-115
Technical Paper | Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT90-A34362
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Measurements of the mean velocity, wall shear stresses, and turbulent Reynolds stresses were performed in wall subchannels of two rod bundles. The rod bundle of four parallel rods was arranged symmetrically in a rectangular channel. The pitch-to-diameter ratio was 1.148, and the wall-to-diameter ratios were 1.045 and 1.074, respectively. The Reynolds numbers in these investigations were 6.11 × 104 and 7.07 × 104, respectively. The experimental results demonstrate once more that the structure of turbulence in rod bundles differs greatly from the structure in circular tubes. Especially in the narrow gaps between the rods and channel walls, there are increased levels of turbulence intensities in both the axial and azimuthal directions and, hence, of the kinetic energy of turbulence, caused by a strong turbulent momentum transport through the gaps. In comparison with the previous investigations in these geometries, however, arranged asymmetrically in the rectangular channels, the momentum transport between the subchannels across the gap between the rods is negligible. The comparison between the experimental wall shear stress distributions and those computed by the VELASCO code shows strong deviations, especially in the gap regions between the rods and channel walls. More sophisticated analytical tools than presently available are required to predict turbulent flow through rod bundles with sufficient accuracy.