ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Remembering ANS member Gil Brown
Brown
The nuclear community is mourning the loss of Gilbert Brown, who passed away on July 11 at the age of 77 following a battle with cancer.
Brown, an American Nuclear Society Fellow and an ANS member for nearly 50 years, joined the faculty at Lowell Technological Institute—now the University of Massachusetts–Lowell—in 1973 and remained there for the rest of his career. He eventually became director of the UMass Lowell nuclear engineering program. After his retirement, he remained an emeritus professor at the university.
Sukesh Aghara, chair of the Nuclear Engineering Department Heads Organization, noted in an email to NEDHO members and others that “Gil was a relentless advocate for nuclear energy and a deeply respected member of our professional community. He was also a kind and generous friend—and one of the reasons I ended up at UMass Lowell. He served the university with great dedication. . . . Within NEDHO, Gil was a steady presence and served for many years as our treasurer. His contributions to nuclear engineering education and to this community will be dearly missed.”
Karen H. Koger, M. Jonathan Haire, Brett L. Humphrys, Jay F. Manneschmidt, Keiichi Setoguchi, Ryodai Nakai
Nuclear Technology | Volume 85 | Number 3 | June 1989 | Pages 251-258
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34247
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Availability information contained within the Centralized Reliability Data Organization (CREDO) liquid-metal reactor (LMR) data base is presented, and the availability critical items lists are developed. Individual components are ranked in prioritized lists from worst to best performers from an availability standpoint. Availability, as used here, is assumed to be an inherent characteristic of the component and is not necessarily assumed to be related to plant operability. A major observation is that of ∼5000 components analyzed at each reactor site, a few components have a much higher unavailability factor than the average. In particular, 15 components contribute 93, 77, and 87% of the total system unavailability for the Experimental Breeder Reactor II, the Fast Flux Test Facility, and the Japanese Experimental Fast Reactor (JOYO), respectively. Critical components common to all three sites are mechanical pumps and electromagnetic pumps. By identifying components in this way, site personnel will be more efficient in their attempts at increasing overall system availability; i.e., attention can be focused on components that have a high contribution to overall system unavailability. All three sites demonstrate that low maintainability (i.e., long repair times) is about twice as likely to contribute to unavailability of a component than unreliability (i.e., high failure rates). The analyses were conducted using data and information from CREDO, the largest repository of LMR component reliability data in the world. The system is cosponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy and the Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation of Japan. The CREDO data base contains information on a population of >20 000 components and addresses ∼1500 events (i.e., abnormal component occurrences). A conservative estimation is that total component operating hours approaches 2.2 billion hours.