ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Swiss nuclear power and the case for long-term operation
Designed for 40 years but built to last far longer, Switzerland’s nuclear power plants have all entered long-term operation. Yet age alone says little about safety or performance. Through continuous upgrades, strict regulatory oversight, and extensive aging management, the country’s reactors are being prepared for decades of continued operation, in line with international practice.
Harry A. Morewitz
Nuclear Technology | Volume 83 | Number 2 | November 1988 | Pages 117-133
Technical Paper | Critical Review | doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A34155
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Several very low probability light water reactor (LWR) accidents can potentially generate sufficient pressure to challenge the reactor containment integrity. A properly designed filtered vented containment system (FVCS) will prevent containment failure from overpressure and at the same time release only some low-risk fission product gases, which do not contaminate the ground. The existing and proposed FVCSs and other filter systems that could perform the same function are reviewed. Dry filters (fibrous mats, gravel beds, and sand beds), wet scrubbers (water pools, submerged gravel beds, washed fibrous mats, and submerged venturi), and combinations of different types of these filters have been proposed or used as FVCSs. The combination of two different filter types in series is particularly effective if they have substantially different aerosol penetration versus size characteristics. When cost/benefit analyses are considered, it is unclear in many cases whether FVCSs are cost-effective or actually reduce overall risk. At present, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission does not require FVCSs on commercial plants that it licenses. However, some U.S. Department of Energy reactor facilities are equipped with FVCSs and several U.S. utilities have proposed the installation of FVCSs at boiling water reactors (BWRs). They have not been required in Japan, Korea, India, Brazil, Taiwan, Argentina, or Switzerland. In contrast, many European countries believe that cost/benefit analyses have large uncertainties and cannot be used with confidence. They have opted for FVCSs to avoid the possibility of land contamination, to reduce the planned evacuation radius, and to provide an additional option for severe accident management. Although the first European FVCS installation was a large, expensive gravel-bed filter shared by two Swedish BWRs, the trend is toward the installation of small, lower cost FVCSs: sand beds or stainless steel fiber filters at French and German pressurized water reactors and multistage filters, consisting of a submerged venturi scrubber followed by a demister/filter, at German BWRs and Swedish LWRs.