ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Jeff Place on INPO’s strategy for industry growth
As executive vice president for industry strategy at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Jeff Place leads INPO’s industry-facing work, engaging directly with chief nuclear officers.
William L. Daugherty, K. Linga Murty
Nuclear Technology | Volume 80 | Number 3 | March 1988 | Pages 443-450
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A34068
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
X-ray diffraction techniques have been used to measure the texture of Zircaloy-4, which is described quantitatively by the crystallite orientation distribution function (CODF). Procedures for evaluating the anisotropy parameters in the modified Hill equation (R and P) from the CODF and their use in predicting creep behavior are reviewed. Alternatively, the same anisotropy parameters can be obtained from creep test data using appropriate mechanical deformation concepts. These R and P parameters are used to predict the creep behavior of fuel rod cladding both out of pile and in pile. The procedures involved in obtaining the anisotropy parameters from either crystallographic texture data or creep test data are summarized. These two approaches, previously discussed separately in the literature, are brought together for a direct comparison. Predictions of creep behavior based on texture measurements are compared with creep data. The utility of the anisotropy parameters in predicting postirradiation cladding dimensions is illustrated by reviewing the work of another research group. Excellent agreement between their model predictions and experimental results of postirradiation examination is observed.