ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Swiss nuclear power and the case for long-term operation
Designed for 40 years but built to last far longer, Switzerland’s nuclear power plants have all entered long-term operation. Yet age alone says little about safety or performance. Through continuous upgrades, strict regulatory oversight, and extensive aging management, the country’s reactors are being prepared for decades of continued operation, in line with international practice.
Warren F. Witzig, Sunil D. Weerakkody
Nuclear Technology | Volume 78 | Number 1 | July 1987 | Pages 24-33
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT87-A34005
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Past experiences such as the Bhopal incident in India (1985) and the Chernobyl reactor accident in the USSR (April 1986) stress the significance of timely evacuations as a protective measure against accidental releases of radioactivity or toxic material to the atmosphere. While timely evacuation has the potential to save many lives, there is a finite risk associated with the act of evacuation itself. From a detailed questionnaire, data were obtained on 320 past evacuation events that took place in the United States from 1972 to 1985 to quantify risks associated with evacuations. Subsequently, these risks are used to assess the societal impact associated with evacuations of sectors of different radii surrounding a nuclear power plant. It is found that risks associated with evacuation of a 16-km radius to be ∼100 times greater than the risks associated with a 3.2-km radius evacuation. Also, an individual’s fatality risk due to evacuation is found to be equal to the risk attributed to a radiation dose between 110 and 5800 mrem (0.0011 and 0.058 Gy), depending on the dose response model used to assess the radiation risk for a 320-km round-trip evacuation. This concept can be applied to nonnuclear incidents such as rail accidents and other industrial or natural incidents.