ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
OECD NEA meeting focuses on irradiation experiments
Members of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency’s Second Framework for Irradiation Experiments (FIDES-II) joint undertaking gathered from September 29 to October 3 in Ketchum, Idaho, for the technical advisory group and governing board meetings hosted by Idaho National Laboratory. The FIDES-II Framework aims to ensure and foster competences in experimental nuclear fuel and structural materials in-reactor experiments through a diverse set of Joint Experimental Programs (JEEPs).
Alexander P. Murray
Nuclear Technology | Volume 77 | Number 2 | May 1987 | Pages 194-209
Technical Paper | Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT87-A33984
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two mathematical models have been derived for chemical decontamination of nuclear reactor films, starting from mass transfer and kinetic fundamentals. The first model predicts a linear field decrease with time, while the second model implies an exponential decrease. Both models are compared to Westinghouse experimental data. The exponential model agrees very well with the boiling water reactor decontamination data, generating gross rate constants of 0.875 to 1.105 h−1 at 121°C. Neither model correlates well with the pressurized water reactor data. This modeling exercise indicates that field decrease versus time is a better approach than the raw “decontamination factor” normally presented in the literature. It also suggests that specimen effective surface area and related properties should be measured. Both avenues should be pursued in future decontamination programs.