ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Constantine P. Tzanos
Nuclear Technology | Volume 77 | Number 3 | June 1987 | Pages 263-278
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT87-A33966
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A model was developed for faster than real-time liquid-metal fast breeder reactor core transient analysis for purposes of continuous on-line data validation, plant state verification, and fault identification. The basic feature of this model is the use of a nodal approximation for the coolant, cladding, and fuel temperatures that gives adequately accurate power and temperature predictions with very few axial nodes. In applications of this methodology to fast loss-of-flow and overpower transients, computation times of about one-thirtieth of the real transient time per thermal-hydraulic channel were obtained. The predicted coolant and cladding temperature distributions were practically identical to those resulting from detailed finite difference computations. The predicted fuel temperatures differed by ∼1% or less from those obtained from the same finite difference computations. The analysis of the Transient Reactor Test Facility experiment TS-1C and the Experimental Breeder Reactor II experiment SHRT-17 showed very good agreement between model predictions and measurements.