ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Swiss nuclear power and the case for long-term operation
Designed for 40 years but built to last far longer, Switzerland’s nuclear power plants have all entered long-term operation. Yet age alone says little about safety or performance. Through continuous upgrades, strict regulatory oversight, and extensive aging management, the country’s reactors are being prepared for decades of continued operation, in line with international practice.
Constantine P. Tzanos
Nuclear Technology | Volume 76 | Number 3 | March 1987 | Pages 337-351
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT87-A33919
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method was developed for faster than real-time liquid-metal fast breeder reactor intermediate heat exchanger (IHX) analysis for purposes of continuous on-line data validation, plant state verification, and fault identification. The basic feature of this method is the utilization of spatial nodes whose sizes vary with time. The use of time-variant node sizes leads to adequately accurate solutions with a few nodes and at short computation times. Applications of this methodology to reference IHX problems with the IBM 3033 machine showed that the computation time for steady-state analysis was ∼6 ms. For transient analysis, a computation time that was one-sixteenth of the real transient time was achieved. This time can be further reduced if the special sparse structure of the system Jacobian matrix is exploited. The analysis of the Experimental Breeder Reactor-II test 8A showed that the maximum difference between temperatures predicted by this methodology and measurements was ∼6K.