ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Mirion announces appointments
Mirion Technologies has announced three senior leadership appointments designed to support its global nuclear and medical businesses while advancing a company-wide digital and AI strategy. The leadership changes come as Mirion seeks to advance innovation and maintain strong performance in nuclear energy, radiation safety, and medical applications.
Constantine P. Tzanos
Nuclear Technology | Volume 76 | Number 3 | March 1987 | Pages 337-351
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT87-A33919
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method was developed for faster than real-time liquid-metal fast breeder reactor intermediate heat exchanger (IHX) analysis for purposes of continuous on-line data validation, plant state verification, and fault identification. The basic feature of this method is the utilization of spatial nodes whose sizes vary with time. The use of time-variant node sizes leads to adequately accurate solutions with a few nodes and at short computation times. Applications of this methodology to reference IHX problems with the IBM 3033 machine showed that the computation time for steady-state analysis was ∼6 ms. For transient analysis, a computation time that was one-sixteenth of the real transient time was achieved. This time can be further reduced if the special sparse structure of the system Jacobian matrix is exploited. The analysis of the Experimental Breeder Reactor-II test 8A showed that the maximum difference between temperatures predicted by this methodology and measurements was ∼6K.